Comparing BCA, Bradford, and UV protein quantification methods for scientists
Understanding the pros and cons of BCA, Bradford, and UV methods of protein quantification
Measuring the abundance of proteins in a sample is essential for biological studies and medical diagnostics. For instance, a sudden rise or drop in the concentration of a particular protein after adding a drug suggests a key role in the mechanism of the biological response. In the laboratory, accurate protein concentrations are needed to perform Western blotting and chemical reactions, such as fluorophore conjugations. In the clinic, measuring interleukins or other cytokines in COVID-19 patients using highly sensitive methods such as ELISAs may help predict the severity of the disease (PMID: 32283152).
There are several methods for determining the concentration of protein in samples and reagents. Among them, the BCA, Bradford, and ultraviolet (UV) methods are the most widely used in scientific research. Each method relies on different scientific principles and has its own advantages and disadvantages. For our HumanKine® cytokines and growth factors, we use BCA for its high sensitivity and range.
For our antibodies, we previously used the Bradford method; however, we have now transitioned to the UV method using the Nanodrop spectrophotometer due to the added sensitivity and low sample volume requirements.
The BCA method uses a colorimetric reaction between BCA (Bicinchoninic acid), copper (Cu2+) sulfate, and proteins. Under alkaline conditions, the peptide bonds in proteins reduce divalent copper ions to monovalent copper ions. Monovalent copper ions are then chelated by BCA to form a stable complex that absorbs purple light, turning the solution from green to purple. Since the reduction reaction is proportional to protein concentration, the light absorption of the solution at 562 nm (purple) by a plate reader or spectrophotometer can then be used to calculate protein concentration.
Table 1. Pros and cons of the BCA method.
|High sensitivity||Reaction affected by reducing agents and chelators e.g. EDTA|
|Wide detection range (20-2000ug/ml)|
|Simple, quick 45 min protocol|
|Does not require expensive machinery|
The Bradford method, also known as the Coomassie brilliant blue method, is named after its inventor Marion Bradford from the University of Georgia. Coomassie brilliant blue is a triphenylmethane dye that changes color from red in its cationic, unbound form, to blue in its anionic form when bound to protein. When protein is present, the negative sulfonic groups of the red dye molecules donate electrons to positive side chains such as lysine and arginine. This destabilizes the protein, promoting van der Waals interactions and exposing hydrophobic residues with the dye to form a stable complex with the dye in its blue anionic form. The absorption peak of the blue form is 595 nm and the optical density of the complex has a linear relationship with the protein content with a certain range.
Table 2. Pros and cons of the Bradford Method
|One-step, <10 minute assay||Uses a significant amount of a sample|
|Does not require expensive machinery||Reaction is affected by presence of common protein surfactants (e.g. Triton X, SDS)|
|Not useful for proteins with above or below average amount of basic amino acids|
**Note: Coomassie brilliant blue G250 for detecting protein concentration and Coomassie brilliant blue R250 for staining PAGE gel are not the same! G250 quickly reacts with protein but stains the gel slowly, so it is best for protein quantification. R250 reacts slowly with protein, stains the gel faster, and is easy to elute – making it better suited for PAGE gel staining.
UV Method (Nanodrop)
The UV method uses an ultraviolet spectrophotometer to estimate protein concentration. It takes advantage of the property that aromatic amino acids (including tryptophan, lysine, and phenylalanine) in protein molecules contain conjugated double bonds which can absorb UV light (maximum absorption peak is at 280 nm wavelength). Based on the Beer-Lambert Law (below), UV absorption can be used to calculate concentration.
A = ɛcl
- A is the absorbance (e.g. A280)
- ɛ is the molar extinction coefficient, M-1 cm-1 (which can be found in the literature)
- c is the molar concentration
- l is the optical path length in cm (e.g. length of cuvette)
Table 3. Pros and cons of the UV (Nanodrop) method
|Highly sensitive||Interferes with compounds that absorb light at 280nm, such as nucleic acids|
|Does not require ant additional reagents||Need an appropriate reference protein to test samples with above or below average amounts of aromatic amino acids|
|Uses a small amount of sample|
|Assay does not affect protein activity|
There is no perfect solution for the determination of protein concentration, so selecting a detection method that suits your sample best is important.
1. Zhou Yuenan, Wang Zhan, etc. Talking about the quantitative detection method of protein content[J]. Food Research and Development, 2014.
2. Fan Shuangshuang, Li Zhengping. Comparison of several methods for detecting protein concentration[N]. Journal of Chengde Teachers College for Nationalities, 2004
3. Fan Huajie, Li Wenjie. Reasonable application of protein quantitative methods[J]. Chinese International Medical Journal, 2003
Last updated November 2022
Western blot products overview
Tag & loading control antibodies
SignalBright chemiluminescent substrate
Detecting low abundance proteins via Western blot
In search of low molecular weight proteins
Lysate preparation: why RIPA buffer is best
Lysate preparation: how to optimize your extraction
Loading control antibodies for Western blot
Why does the observed protein molecular weight (MW) differ from the calculated one?
Proteases for Western blotting: Choosing the right tools for the job
Learn how to save precious hours on your IP, IF, and Western blotting experiments
Stay up-to-date with our latest news and events. New to Proteintech? Get 10% off your first order when you sign up.